PIPA, SOPA and OPEN Act Quick Reference Guide

From the ALA Washington Office District Dispatch Blog:

The last month or so has seen a flurry of anti-piracy, online infringing, copyright-related bills.  The latest newcomer is the Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act or OPEN Act (S. 2029).  Introduced on December 17, 2011 by Sen. Wyden (D-OR), along with Senators Moran (R-KS) and Cantwell (D-WA), the OPEN Act is being heralded as a more palatable alternative to existing anti-piracy bills — The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act of 2011 or PIPA (S. 968), and The Stop Online Piracy Act or SOPA (H.R. 3261). 

All three bills take aim at any website beyond U.S. borders that distribute counterfeit or copyright infringing products.   To capture how all three bills compare and contrast, I’ve constructed the PIPA, SOPA and OPEN Act Quick Reference Guide (pdf).  Not meant to be comprehensive (it would be pages and pages), nor too legalese (I’m a librarian, not a lawyer — although I did consult our legal consultant), the chart helps depict the nuanced and not-so-nuanced differences among the bills.

What you’ll see (hopefully at a glance), is unlike PIPA or SOPA, the OPEN Act focuses solely on curbing online infringement by cutting off websites’ payment processing and ad networks. In contrast, PIPA and SOPA go further in that they also incentivize internet companies to cut off access to websites.  The tactics the latter two bills employ have a potential chilling effect on 1st Amendment free speech rights and intellectual freedom, as well as weaken cyber security, and threaten privacy.
 
Also, the guide captures the status of the bills as of today, January 10.  It is worth noting that the bills are in the midst of the legislative process — the U.S. House Judiciary committee will resume markup of SOPA on January 17th and the U.S. Senate has scheduled a cloture vote on PIPA for January 24th.  In addition, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Rep. Issa (R-Calif.) announced a hearing has been scheduled for January 18th on the potential impact of Domain Name Service (DNS) and search engine blocking.
 
The ALA will continue to voice strong opposition to PIPA and SOPA, while further analysis of the OPEN Act is needed.
 
Corey Williams
Associate Director, Office of Government Relations
American Library Association

2 Comments

  1. I need someone to explain to me why SOPA is bad for public libraries. I may seeing the issue incorrectly, but it seems to me that getting rid of some of the free misinformation on the Internet would only help bring more patrons to realize the importance of public libraries. Here in Suffolk County NY we offer an excellent selection of online resources through our “live-brary.com” site. This service provides some of the highest quality paid databases. You get what you pay for and free information is often not very good. So please, I mean this, I’m open to hearing all sides, why is SOPA bad for public libraries? Thanks.

5 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. SOPA Strike
  2. SOPA, PIPA, and Libraries - LSU Libraries
  3. No maps for these territories » SOPA/PIPA and libraries
  4. SOPA and PIPA | PLI Librarian
  5. Luego de SOPA y PIPA ¿qué viene o debería venir?

Comments are closed.