Campus Compact Fund for Positive Engagement Mini Grants for Academic Institutions, Due July 14

Over the past two years, longstanding political and social rifts in the United States have become deeper and more overtly hostile, embittering our already polarized public life. Various groups and individuals on our campuses and in our communities have experienced identity-based threats and marginalization that have led to heightened levels of fear and anxiety within campus communities. Students whose political views differ from the majority of their peers have come to fear social ostracism. The intensification of these phenomena harms students, interferes with the achievement of higher education’s mission, and threatens the health of our democracy.

Faculty, administrators, students, and their partners are working to address a variety of challenges: balancing the right to free speech with the need to cultivate learning environments in which all students can be successful, supporting students whose safety and well being are threatened by public policy or rhetoric, responding to attacks on academic freedom, and cultivating spaces in which all students can constructively build relationships and exchange ideas with one another across differences of all kinds–including ideological differences.

The purpose of the Campus Compact Fund for Positive Engagement is to catalyze experimental responses to challenges arising from this new climate. Up to 40 grants of $5000 per institution will be awarded through a national competition.

Read more about this opportunity and apply online.

Member of the Week: Robert P. Holley

Robert P. HolleyRobert P. Holley is a professor emeritus at Wayne State University in Huntington Woods, MI. Robert has been a member of ACRL since 1974 and is your ACRL member of the week for June 19, 2017.

1. Describe yourself in three words: Intellectual, curious, eclectic.

2. What are you reading (or listening to on your mobile device)? Les Liaisons Dangereuses by Laclos to maintain my fluency in French.

3. Describe ACRL in three words: Innovative, focused, valuable.

4. What do you value about ACRL? The national conferences. I’ve attended all but two since they began in Boston in 1979. Beyond the practical sessions on library issues, I remember the amazing keynote speakers. My favorite choice for its audacity and support for intellectual freedom was John Waters at the 2007 Baltimore conference. This unconventional media star shocked some in the audience but exemplified for me the counter culture aspects of many librarians.

5. What have you as an academic librarian contributed to your campus? Until my retirement in 2015, I worked as a librarian and library educator in three large research universities. One of my goals was to undermine the negative stereotypes about librarians by being active in the intellectual, political, and social life of the university. Having this dual career, I also worked to bridge the divide between librarians and faculty by sharing my perspectives on how the two groups sometimes misunderstood each other.

6. In your own words: The best thing that ever happened to me was not getting a faculty appointment in 1971, the first year of the PhD glut. I became a library assistant in the Sterling Memorial Library, Yale University, and six months later started commuting to Columbia University to get my library science degree. I’ve been extremely happy as a librarian, teacher, and researcher. I have wide ranging interests and delight in synthesizing information from multiple sources, two traits librarianship values. I’m pleased that I ended my career with broad experience both as a librarian and an educator.

Editor’s Note: Are you an ACRL member? Would you like to be featured as ACRL Member of the Week? Nominate a colleague? Contact Mary Jane Petrowski at for more information.

ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Toolkit Launches

Framework for Informaiton Literacy coverThe ACRL Framework Advisory Board (FAB) is pleased to announce the launch of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Toolkit. The ACRL Framework for Information Literacy Toolkit is intended as a freely available professional development resource that can be used and adapted by both individuals and groups in order to foster understanding and use of the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. The ACRL Framework Toolkit is available on the ACRL LibGuides site.

Librarians can use the ACRL Framework Toolkit resources in a variety of ways:  for their individual professional development needs; to form a community of practice with their colleagues around the Framework and information literacy; and to develop workshops and professional development opportunities in their libraries and also for local, regional, and state-level events and conferences.

The ACRL Framework Toolkit contains four modules: Finding Time to Engage the Framework, The Framework’s Structure, Foundations of the Framework, and Strategies for Using the Framework. A fifth module, Collaboration and Conversations with the Framework, is currently in development.  Each module includes essential questions, learning outcomes, and active learning resources such as guided reading activities, discussion prompts, and lists of key readings.

Please direct any questions to FAB Chair Donna Witek at

Keeping Up With… Statistical Literacy

The latest edition of Keeping Up With…, ACRL’s online current awareness publication featuring concise briefs on trends in academic librarianship and higher education, is now available. This month’s issue features a discussion of Statistical Literacy by Lindsay Davis and Lynda Kellam.

ACRL is currently accepting topic suggestions for future editions of Keeping Up With… . Visit the Keeping Up With…website for more information or contact David Free at with questions or to submit topics.

Library Copyright Alliance Files Comments Regarding NAFTA Negotiations

Library Copyright Alliance Logo The Administration has announced its intent to commence negotiations to modernize the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative has requested public comment on what should be addressed in the negotiations, including “relevant trade-related intellectual property issues that should be addressed in the negotiations.” On Friday, June 9, the Library Copyright Alliance (LCA, whose members are the American Library Association, Association of Research Libraries, and Association of College and Research Libraries) filed comments making the following points:

1. Exceptions and Limitations. LCA strongly supports inclusion in NAFTA of a provision based on Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) Article 18.66, “Balance in Copyright and Related Rights Systems.” This language would insure that nothing in NAFTA would in any direct or indirect way undermine the fair use right. This language would also lead to improvements in Mexican copyright law, which would allow libraries in Mexico to engage in more cross-border activities that benefit U.S. users. Finally, inclusion of this language would place a uniquely American stamp on an international IP agreement.

2. Exhaustion. NAFTA should include a strong exhaustion provision (including international exhaustion) based on U.S. law. This would ensure that manufacturers would not have the ability to game the trade system to their benefit and to the detriment of U.S. worker, consumers, and libraries.

3. Intermediary Safe Harbors. Because Mexico has not yet adopted safe harbors, NAFTA should include an obligation to enact liability limitations for Internet intermediaries. Internet intermediary safe harbors in Mexican copyright law would encourage cross border activities that benefit U.S. libraries and their users.

4. Copyright Term. NAFTA should require no more than a term of life plus 50 years. Including in NAFTA a life plus 70 term of protection, as was included in TPP Article 18.63, would limit the flexibility of Congress to shorten the term of protection in the future.

5. Other Matters. The TPP IP chapter contains other positive, balancing language that LCA believes should be included in NAFTA. This language addresses the appropriate objectives of IP rights, proportionately of remedies, and prevention of abusive enforcement practices.

1 2 3 435