Jan 08

Evidence-Based Librarianship Discussion Group

At the meeting of the Evidence-Based Librarianship Discussion Group of ULS at ALA in June 2012, one major discussion point was to define “evidence-based librarianship.” To follow up on that discussion, three committee members and I have committed to reading a series of articles on different aspects of evidence-based librarianship. We hope to offer a brief summary of each of the articles, post the resulting bibliography, and then use the articles as a jumping off point for a discussion at Midwinter in Seattle. We meet on Sun., Jan. 27, from 10:30 to 11:30 in the Washington State Convention Center, TCC LL2.

We hope to see some of you there! If you are interested in summarizing an article, let me know.

Lisa Horowitz
lisah@MIT.EDU
Convener, ACRL ULS EBLDG

This is our potential reading list:

Editorials by Andrew Booth in EBLIP
http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/11826

http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/4343

http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/136

Abbott, W. A. (2006). Persuasive evidence: Improving customer service through evidence based librarianship. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 1(1), 58-68.

Booth A. (2006). Clear and present questions: Formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 355-368.

Booth, A. (2009). A bridge too far? Stepping stones for evidence based practice in an academic context.” New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15(1), 3-34.

Booth, A. (2010). Upon reflection: Five mirrors of evidence-based practice. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(3), 253-256.

Dalrymple, P.W. (2010). Applying evidence in practice: What we can learn from healthcare. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 5(1): 43-47.

Eldredge, J. (2006). Evidence-based librarianship: The EBL process. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 341-354.

Glynn L. (2006). A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech, 24(3), 387-399.

Greenwood, H. & Cleeve, M. (2008). “Embracing change: Evidence-based management in action.” Library Management, 29(3), 173-184.

Lakos, A. (2007). Evidence-Based library management: The leadership challenge. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(4), 431-450.

Ryan, P. (2006). EBL and library assessment: Two solitudes? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 1(4), 77-80.


Dec 04

Many Hats, Many Tools: Getting Things Done in the Library

Author: John M. Jackson

Although my subject expertise is in Medieval Studies, I often call myself a renaissance librarian for, like many of my colleagues, my job description serves as a set of loosely-defined and sometimes unheeded guidelines. According to my business card I am a cataloger, but I live daily within that protean phrase “other duties as assigned.” I also teach information literacy classes, provide in-person reference, monitor virtual chat queues, serve on search and advisory committees, conduct original research, debug websites, develop workshops, and perform other duties typically not required of technical services staff at USC. Keeping track of all these myriad and desperately varied activities requires a little discipline and a lot of technology. For the benefit of ULS Universe readers in similar situations, I want to share some of the digital tools that help me keep everything in sync, in focus, and in order.
Task Management: Remember the Milk

Working without a task list is fine if you have a single workflow, work in one location all day, or do not need to depend on others to get things done. If any of those situations doesn’t apply to you then you may need to keep a running list of your unresolved tasks. Remember the Milk [http://www.rememberthemilk.com/] allows me to create multiple lists and organize tasks within those lists based on location, duration, contingencies, context, priority level, and any other parameter I define. I have a list for each major area of responsibility (e.g. ACRL discussion group, research guides, professional blog) and tasks within those lists are organized primarily according to David Allen’s GTD schema [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done] with help from Doug Ireton [http://blog.rememberthemilk.com/2008/05/guest-post-advanced-gtd-with-remember-the-milk/].

File Management: Dropbox and Evernote

Between cataloging, teaching, and the reference desk, I never stay at a single computer for long but I often need access to my files at the drop of a hat, so for files that do not require high security I use Dropbox [https://www.dropbox.com/tour] for online storage. Dropbox provides cloud-based storage space for your files and syncs automatically with files stored on your local machine (desktop or mobile device). Not only does Dropbox give me access to my files anywhere with an internet connection, but it stores multiple, past versions of each file, providing backups in the unlikely event that one of my devices suffers a systems crash.

While I use Dropbox to store most of my files, I have begun moving some files to Evernote [http://evernote.com/], a “ubiquitous capture” utility for managing not just text files, but also web clippings, images, and voice notes. Like Dropbox, it provides cloud-based storage space for my files, but the organizational structure is more similar to a three-ring binder whereas Dropbox mimics the typical file folder structure of most desktop computers. Evernote provides a minimal amount of metadata options (tags, location, URLs, folders) and automatic “smart searches” that make it a more robust option than Dropbox when it comes to organization. Specifically, I’ve started moving my instruction materials to Evernote so that I can organize them based on (1) class time needed, (2) expected learning outcomes, (3) tools/prep needed, and (4) format. This allows me to quickly pull together material for information literacy classes and share digital objects with colleagues.

Email Management: Gmail

Despite my disdain for email as a communication platform, I cannot function at my place of work without it. Thankfully, it’s possible to route all my email addresses (personal, professional and otherwise) through a single Gmail interface and take advantage of Gmail’s robust filtering options [http://lifehacker.com/5861810/master-the-new-gmail-with-these-tips-shortcuts-and-add+ons]. As you may have noticed, all the screenshots used in this post show my Gmail tab with a “0” unread items count. Through the science of filters, every email that comes into my inbox is automatically routed to an appropriate folder and, depending on the context and who sent it, will be starred if it needs follow-up action. I haven’t missed an important email yet and my inbox stays managed nonetheless.

Sanity Management: Twitter

Finally, the one additional window that I keep open on all my devices at all times is my Twitter stream. Aside from providing me with up-to-date information on library issues, current technology, trends in academia, and the doings of my colleagues around the globe, Twitter is a constant reminder that my problems are not unique, that my experiences are often shared, and that I’m not alone in this vast sea of digitally networked information. All of the tools described above are web-based and have both iOS and Android apps and so they are always accessible anywhere with an internet connection. I hope you will find them as useful as I do. Good luck out there!

Author: John M. Jackson
Bio Line: John is a Library Supervisor at the University of Southern California’s Grand Library. You can find him on Twitter as @johnxlibris [http://twitter.com/johnxlibris]


Nov 28

Plan to attend the ACRL ULS Social at ALA Midwinter

ALA Midwinter is just around the corner. As you start to prepare your daily conference schedule, remember to add “ACRL ULS Social” to your calendar for Saturday 26 January 5:30 pm -7:00 pm at the Elephant & Castle Pub and Restaurant in the Red Lion Hotel. Free finger food and a cash bar. A grand time will be had by all, and we hope to see you there!


Nov 06

Negotiating the Ideal

Author:
Melissa Engleman
University of Minnesota Morris
menglema@morris.umn.edu

From the reference desk to the circulation desk to the weekend grocery run, I find myself constantly promoting information literacy. And while I enjoy the chaos of happenstance, I know that the ideal approach on an academic campus is planned and coordinated. Many of us don’t have the luxury of required information literacy courses, so we make due with one-shot sessions. If we’re really lucky, we can turn those one-shots into something more (double shots?).

My ideal information literacy program would require every person in the world to take one info lit course every year from the age of about 3 to death. It’s that important.

But the back and forth can, at times, feel like talking with a brick wall:

One credit hour every year for university students?

I’m willing to negotiate down to a three credit hour required course for university sophomores.

Ok. How about required sessions (multiple, please) during a required core course?

I’ve experienced the push and pull of academic bureaucracy at three very different institutions. Information literacy can be slow to gain ground and gets sacrificed far too easily, even at those institutions willing to admit its importance.

So, what’s a librarian to do?

The teacher in me wants to wax poetic about lifelong learning and better citizens. The business librarian in me knows better. You can start with the starry eyed dreamer speeches, but you best back that up with facts, politics, and general schmoozing. And time. So much time.

I’ve had small successes by joining committees, going to campus and social events, and digging through course syllabi for info lit connections. And you can’t just sit back and wait for things to roll. Market yourself and your instruction abilities. Bang on a few doors and shove your way on committees. Many times this can be as simple as asking. Sometimes, you have to weasel (or finesse, if you prefer) your way through campus politics.

Once you’re in, don’t sit down and shut up. Voice ideas, no matter how small, pushing in favor of information literacy. Do this even if you’re new. You’d be amazed how you can direct a conversation, and university policies, if you speak up about retention, accreditation, and lifelong learning issues.
At my last position, I increased the instruction stats for a business college. I did this by joining key committees no one else wanted (they were boring), like University Studies and a business college committee. I worked with university leaders, college deans, and department chairs, increasing the number of professors utilizing library instruction.

In my current incarnation as instruction coordinator at a small university campus, I don’t have as much force. So, I’m starting small. I’m a guest on the Curriculum Committee. I sit with instructors/professors at lunch. I show up at faculty/staff social gatherings. It’s easy to rev up professors about information literacy after a few glasses of wine. I take my ideas and suggestions to higher ups in the university chain of command. I’ve held my current post since the end of August, and I’m already making progress.

Your ideal instruction program may be wildly different. You may feel depressed about your university’s inability to commit to information literacy or librarians as instructors. My advice: don’t stop trying, and don’t stop pushing. If you can’t get something done through regular channels, then dig around them.

Melissa Engleman
University of Minnesota Morris
menglema@morris.umn.edu

Melissa is the Instruction Coordinator at Briggs Library on the Morris campus of the University of Minnesota. She’s a new resident of the frozen North, along with her husband and three furry quadrupeds. Melissa enjoys collecting degrees and is currently looking for an online math program just for kicks. She lives, breathes, and eats library instruction and has plans to take over the world via information literacy.


Oct 26

Join the Technology in University Libraries Committe for an Internet Librarian Round-Up

WHAT
Internet Librarian Lightning Round-Up!
A free webinar presented by the ACRL-ULS Technology & Libraries Committee. This post-conference online session will provide you with an overview of some of the best presentations from Internet Librarian in Monterey, CA. Speakers from a variety of university libraries will present overviews of what they learned at the conference in a lightening-round fashion.

WHEN
Tuesday, October 30th, 12pm-1pm CDT / 1-2pm EDT.

REGISTER NOW
Let us know you’ll be attending: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dG9NeFFubWV2Y0xMUlNmOTRGQnFnNHc6MQ#gid=0. We will e-mail you the link to the live webinar as we get closer.

PRESENTERS
Jennifer Castaldo
Distance Education Librarian/Electronic Resources Manager
Johns Hopkins University/Excelsior College Library
jcastaldo@jhu.edu

Tammy Allgood
Web Services Librarian
Arizona State University
Tammy.Allgood@asu.edu

Cindy Fisher
First-year Experience Librarian
University of Texas at Austin (Perry~Castaneda Library)
cynthfisher@austin.utexas.edu

Roy Degler
Digital Services Librarian
Oklahoma State University
roy.degler@okstate.edu

On behalf of the ACRL-ULS Technology and Libraries Committee,

Sara Arnold-Garza, Towson University
Rebecca Blakiston, University of Arizona
Carolyn Cunningham, University of Texas San Antonio
Dan Chaney, Oklahoma State University
Britt Fagerheim, Utah State University
Kristin Henrich, University of Idaho
Nicole Sump-Crethar, Oklahoma State University


Oct 04

ULS Member Scholarly Work: Lyons & Blosser

Many thanks to Lucy Eleonore Lyons and John Blosser, who shared information about their recently published article. Congratulations, Lucy and John! John is the Head of the Department of Electronic Resources and Collection Analysis, and Lucy is the Coordinator for Collection Analysis in the same department, within the University Library at Northwestern University.

Lyons, L. E., & Blosser, J. (2012). An analysis and allocation system for library collections budgets: The Comprehensive Allocation Process (CAP). Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(5), 294–310. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.07.006


Oct 01

Mid-Level Managers Discussion Group

Are you a manager in an academic library? If so, ULS has a discussion group just for you! The Mid-Level Managers Discussion Group was established to provide a forum to discuss the unique challenges and responsibilities of managers in academic libraries. We meet at ALA Mid-Winter and Annual Conferences to brainstorm practical solutions for management issues, to share information, and to provide support to one another. Because not everyone can attend conferences, we also have a wiki where we share information virtually. Please visit http://wikis.ala.org/acrl/index.php/ULS/MidLevel to find information about training opportunities, links to change management resources, suggestions for professional reading, and examples of activities and exercises we’ve done during our discussion group meetings. Do you have an idea for a future activity or exercise? I’d love to hear about it! Please contact me at lmadden@gsu.edu and I hope to see you at a future discussion group meeting!

Leslie Madden
Convener, Mid-Level Managers Discussion Group


Sep 18

ULS Committee on the Future of University Libraries August 2012 report

The Future of Universities
Prepared by Marilyn Myers, Chair

The universities of which our libraries are a part are experiencing disruptive change. The attention of university decision makers is focused on what must be done now as well as what should be done long-term. Judith Brown, former university administrator and professor emerita at Wesleyan reflects on the difficulties of change in institutions bound to constituencies with significantly different or even competing interests, including faculty, students, parents, alumni, administrators, governing boards, state and federal governments, and the general public. (Brown) She begins with a quote from Machiavelli’s The Prince. “…one should bear in mind that there is nothing more difficult to carry out, nor more dubious of success, nor more dangerous to administer than to introduce a new system of things….”

The following link will take you to the entire report and its comprehensive bibliography…
ULS Committee on the Future of Libraries August 2012 Report

Report @ ALAConnect:
http://connect.ala.org/files/68961/ULS Co. August 2012 Report.pdf


Sep 11

Welcome from the ULS Chair

Hello ULS Members!

Now is a great time to be a part of ULS! ULS strives to keep members informed of the latest trends and innovative practices in the field. Committee on the Future of University Libraries scours higher education literature to identify key issues that will have an impact on academic libraries and publishes its findings in brief articles. You can read the committee’s “University Libraries and Transformation” through the ULS blog and discussion list. You may not always be able to attend Internet Librarian or Computers in Libraries, but Technology in University Libraries’ (TULS) covers the most important highlights in its virtual post-conference presentations. Stay abreast of the latest technology tools through TULS’s column, “Tech Bits”, located in C&RL News. ULS discussion groups provide great opportunities to meet and exchange ideas with colleagues from around the world. Learn valuable management strategies through the Mid-Level Managers Discussion Group, and best practices for organizational effectiveness in the Evidence-Based Discussion Group.

These are just a few of the many services that ULS provides its members. We take our role in sharing innovative ideas and providing continuing education opportunities seriously. We also recognize the importance of networking at conferences, hosting happy hours at every ALA conference, and now ACRL conferences, too!

ULS has had many successes, but we know that we can do more. We are proud to be the largest and most diverse section of ACRL. With the other members of the ULS Executive Committee, I will continue to explore new ways to engage our membership. If you have any suggestions, please feel free to share them!

Stephanie Atkins, Univeristy Libraries Section Chair
satkins@WUSTL.EDU


Aug 28

New Scholarly Publishing Model

From The Scientist: “Opinion: Transparency in Science Publishing,” August 28, 2012

The first substantially new business model to hit science publishing was open access, which we launched with Biomed Central over a decade ago.  After a long interregnum, publishers and scientists are clearly now primed for more radical change.  F1000 Research is very pleased to be among the innovators who are testing new models and who will, ultimately, help make real change a reality.

Read more here.

Older posts «

» Newer posts